Minimum Hardware requirements for Android development


Question

Need information about minimum hardware requirement for better experience in developing Android application.

My current configuration is as follows. P4 3.0 GHz, 512 MB of ram.

Started with Hello Android development on my machine and experience was sluggish, was using Eclipse Helios for development. Emulator used to take lot of time to start. And running program too.
Do I need to upgrade my machine for the development purpose or is there anything else I am missing on my machine(like heavy processing by some other application I might have installed).

And If I do need to upgrade, do I need to upgrade my processor too(that counts to new machine actually, which I am not in favor of), or only upgrading RAM will suffice.

1
31
6/4/2013 5:10:54 PM

Accepted Answer

Firstly, there is an issue with the ADT plugin and Helios which causes lag with looking up Android classes - use Galileo instead (v3.5).

Secondly, the emulators become more resource hungry depending on the version of Android you're developing for. Example, I have a P4 2.4GHz, 1GB RAM PC with Win XP 32-bit and an Android v2.2 emulator takes at least 4-5 minutes to load up. An Android v1.6 emulator on the other hand loads up in less than 1 minute. Remember though that once the emulator is up and running, you can leave it loaded and it will be more responsive than first use.

Also bear in mind that if you give your emulator a 2GB SD card (for example) it will try to create that through virtual memory if there isn't enough physical memory.

17
12/26/2010 8:09:26 AM

I did the following experiment at home:

let's compare how 2 computers compile the same android application in eclipse. Here are the competitors:

"the monster" - pentinum i7 - 16 gig RAM - solid state hard drive

"peabody" - pentinum i3 - 4 gig RAM

The results: when I compiled the same application in eclipse, the monster and peabody took exactly the same amount of time to bring up the emulator to the point where you have to slide the button to run the app: 1 minute 12 seconds.

After that point, the monster executed the app 30-40 seconds faster than peabody.

The monster costs about $500 more than the peabody. So the question is, is it really worth it? In my opinion, No. I can wait the extra 30-40 seconds


Licensed under: CC-BY-SA with attribution
Not affiliated with: Stack Overflow
Icon